From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7160 invoked by uid 1002); 7 Sep 2003 16:15:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 8825 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2003 16:15:52 -0000 From: Jan Krueger Organization: microgalaxy.net To: azarah@gentoo.org Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 18:21:19 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: Troy Dack , Gentoo-Dev References: <200309071755.57773.jk@microgalaxy.net> <1062950837.8455.126.camel@nosferatu.lan> In-Reply-To: <1062950837.8455.126.camel@nosferatu.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309071821.19495.jk@microgalaxy.net> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Some suggestions X-Archives-Salt: bd6dc8a5-3b5b-444a-85a4-857bbc8c6d38 X-Archives-Hash: c6f97589c723d748b1e7e73150260c45 On Sunday 07 September 2003 16:07, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 19:55, Jan Krueger wrote: > Example since you keep bringing it up, and if possible how you would > resolve it. Also, anything that might be harmful, could also be done > in src_install/where ever. put rm -rf / in pkg_postinst put rm -rf / in src_install See the difference? > in src_install/where ever. This can be addressed by other means and is discussed on gentoo-hardened (Mike Frysinger recommended me to discuss it there as i tried here and did not get much response) Jan -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list