From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30297 invoked by uid 1002); 6 Sep 2003 06:23:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 15861 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2003 06:23:03 -0000 From: Tony Clark To: azarah@gentoo.org, vapier@gentoo.org Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 08:23:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 Cc: Gentoo-Dev References: <200309050913.35962.vapier@gentoo.org> <200309051117.48485.vapier@gentoo.org> <1062792957.10805.15.camel@nosferatu.lan> In-Reply-To: <1062792957.10805.15.camel@nosferatu.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309060823.01937.tclark@telia.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] masking glibc-2.3.2-r3 X-Archives-Salt: cf5624cc-43dd-48d6-b90d-4da27857770b X-Archives-Hash: 5a757037b8a920f0719d468ceaef01d2 On Friday 05 September 2003 22.15, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 17:17, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Friday 05 September 2003 10:57, Kumba wrote: > > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > anyone have any qualms with me changing the masking on glibc-2.3.2-r3 > > > > from KEYWORDS="-*" to package.mask ? > > > > ive been using it for quite sometime and was just about to update to > > > > NPTL-0.57 (released like 2 days ago) when i realized i still inject > > > > the latest unstable version of glibc so that my glibc's dont get > > > > screwed up ... i prefer to put masked stuff in package.mask and then > > > > unmask in package.unmask ... -mike > > > > > > I actually have the 20030822 branch update for a glibc-2.3.2-r4 if you > > > want me to put that into Portage. I thought Azarah might've gotten > > > around to it by now, but he may be really busy. I've been using this > > > -r4 prototype on sparc and x86 for about 2 weeks now w/o any issues so > > > far. > > > > if it includes NPTL-0.57 i'd love you long time :) > > the current branch doesnt seem to compile with 0.57 while 0.56 worked > > fine ... > > Yep, need the newer sources - working on it, but just need to be sure > its ok before committing ... Yes please, count me in as a tester. tony -- Contract ASIC and FPGA design. Telephone +46 702 894 667 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x633E2623 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list