From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26543 invoked by uid 1002); 5 Sep 2003 15:17:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 14603 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2003 15:17:50 -0000 From: Mike Frysinger Reply-To: vapier@gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 11:17:38 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <200309050913.35962.vapier@gentoo.org> <3F58A457.70905@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <3F58A457.70905@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_ckKW/Odsbp4Pgag"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200309051117.48485.vapier@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] masking glibc-2.3.2-r3 X-Archives-Salt: d88fa413-3a3e-4aa6-9832-cdc54cadda64 X-Archives-Hash: 57ea3c11f1b77ecb9703e31058943be2 --Boundary-02=_ckKW/Odsbp4Pgag Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 05 September 2003 10:57, Kumba wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > anyone have any qualms with me changing the masking on glibc-2.3.2-r3 > > from KEYWORDS="-*" to package.mask ? > > ive been using it for quite sometime and was just about to update to > > NPTL-0.57 (released like 2 days ago) when i realized i still inject the > > latest unstable version of glibc so that my glibc's dont get screwed up > > ... i prefer to put masked stuff in package.mask and then unmask in > > package.unmask ... -mike > > I actually have the 20030822 branch update for a glibc-2.3.2-r4 if you > want me to put that into Portage. I thought Azarah might've gotten > around to it by now, but he may be really busy. I've been using this > -r4 prototype on sparc and x86 for about 2 weeks now w/o any issues so far. if it includes NPTL-0.57 i'd love you long time :) the current branch doesnt seem to compile with 0.57 while 0.56 worked fine ... -mike --Boundary-02=_ckKW/Odsbp4Pgag Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAP1ipG0FjO5/oN/WBAQJlXQ//dgAIStv6MzkI9DZ+eW2xwS3Mi56GFJ+W /P0A9aGJ5/KoXiYVa5R1GsQi6qA7bbN2GrgUHg5O+gyVzgVae609mJ9iBVPLlMrX WZ5ML20FJxNIYqZ9kI+V86c7myVyx35U4Z9rlM5h9xY+7EfiQztXgZ8xW8yLTTeS MrUo45Qi0cI7j47EEr6+c5fWK7+M7/WtgVT5RHeAlqaXPUwYVMR3gNTN0VYTFUFZ ABps6FctIStkjkoiF+w4wh1pr24OjCtOtvueqOFbmWUucmKMRzSCzcsYoovNlMwK 336b5tiTOlFwFaMZ0l457jSChBKKWldCOuR+VXweTp8cXZbbckdmQ9skKlgmBwr8 xcsdm8Hfat0s9s5QNL/NwDvJ/l6s3WvVNmzRDjyAUQeqj08NpHkPPiOuwoUoTkCL UUYGM31s/d8vT0JtLRBbncYY0mKGilyo4/xwXYiuiL1dXj+FaGhWYcJBMXLy0+y1 YeLychJGBAvPIiJHkbxO8L5LpWfF1bSingqfSWO0jcvpGGvfJSwIWHqIGFShvWyU gVDUgpNQpklhPppFOTT8smpDpJZkH7z+JVRSQpsRI7gMIE0QVzhl0p9EqfAySUWQ wLoAor2hYf+kLP0VN6PzSaMslcn61t5GHgekcU4tuZ8A0ofpsbzaJwlzx0XSWISv 3jfnL7lhtvY= =d6Bc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_ckKW/Odsbp4Pgag--