From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16635 invoked by uid 1002); 5 Sep 2003 13:13:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 5870 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2003 13:13:37 -0000 From: Mike Frysinger Reply-To: vapier@gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 09:13:35 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309050913.35962.vapier@gentoo.org> Subject: [gentoo-dev] masking glibc-2.3.2-r3 X-Archives-Salt: 7996b876-cfac-420b-969b-9c859947add3 X-Archives-Hash: e0d4a51c23d1ef62286d8956f9f2f790 anyone have any qualms with me changing the masking on glibc-2.3.2-r3 from KEYWORDS="-*" to package.mask ? ive been using it for quite sometime and was just about to update to NPTL-0.57 (released like 2 days ago) when i realized i still inject the latest unstable version of glibc so that my glibc's dont get screwed up ... i prefer to put masked stuff in package.mask and then unmask in package.unmask ... -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list