From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16723 invoked by uid 1002); 5 Sep 2003 04:13:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 21320 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2003 04:13:34 -0000 From: Mike Frysinger Reply-To: vapier@gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 00:13:17 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <200309041251.49718.vapier@gentoo.org> <20030904214530.1d18c60d.cam@cameuh.net> <20030904221405.6f2b9f22.degrenier@easyconnect.fr> In-Reply-To: <20030904221405.6f2b9f22.degrenier@easyconnect.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_t1AW/qi2aX2gxbl"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200309050013.33902.vapier@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Breaking up the beast known as app-games X-Archives-Salt: a7507bdc-4da9-4e5a-81be-b50dc6a666e6 X-Archives-Hash: 05ed8c9bb89a264fcdca86b2f8c724d3 --Boundary-02=_t1AW/qi2aX2gxbl Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 04 September 2003 16:14, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: > On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 21:45:30 +0200 > > Camille Huot wrote: > > sounds nice. I think there is some work to be done to portage to get > > this working. > > I don't see the main difficulty in modifying portage, but rather in > doing the transition to the new tree without breaking backward > compatibility with old installed portage versions. There are some > people, especialy those who run gentoo on production servers, who don't > do their weekly deep update :/ nah, if we change the rsync targets ... :) then have the 'next gen' of portage sync against the new target ... old peo= ple=20 wouldnt get updates so they'd be encouraged to upgrade their portage and=20 update the rsync target ... i'm not saying that this rsync is the answer ... the point is that it can b= e=20 done semi-easily ... =2Dmike --Boundary-02=_t1AW/qi2aX2gxbl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAP1gNbEFjO5/oN/WBAQJn3hAA0y7ubV15Ins3X06dS4gnluE3M0SKao7V BK7TNMsIgodCUJxQId8D6oHhVaNd6kVuRy/mGNjZnpDrfZij/B94NKZIDUby2yp5 lKmGRICB+Z/fIry3JO+b6mAyiS7jUU0a5jB67B3m/Ads4KXXgEqxUq0X3FjWue83 sIiev3ZDqygQPa4WdBTsFHgQMiyxTpB9XBuKrEp6mI62FJeCPY6VJkQNOoQSvBix Ly/UAfSHZg1Ng5VZS+RYen6RLNVdhhFYHtLlfsFaOLG5cUunJwTbx7zIhvuAFHlu pAV2eUkM0PUbjj2wvoEJRMDo65nmRPkt2SN5O03KLoRoSZNNQRp3Gt3IjmioeLNe Yt/KQ0Yd8M0vpQU2GxARJI28ZsjiCo2UNEX+lOwW+wbXAVEXicWwDNb6DoICxc6H j+tHAdBGtLS72ND+ZoU853E9U7bEpZ72qrObDhYx33ZAx9+eGKpPTA1wSNVUfAZU SMIVwhpqP9w+DwG6szbVlE4SP5aEPXsfRb2NFg0MrwMynzWmC5eMgY0TF5jDs9PD 23MwFu2XlFKzKRoowXQrVHLjdeLMeTBGMguC2Ws8kdbNIEjeVsxSZV1wNTnvZCiR KmPfKKnRufeW4cLyfsBsShV0ikZdyE4Xy7wq7qC7Ihv7bwcN7DOBMltwaM8UveEP XoqaACi/3Bk= =zt2p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_t1AW/qi2aX2gxbl--