From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8574 invoked by uid 1002); 4 Sep 2003 20:07:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 1765 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2003 20:07:55 -0000 Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 22:14:05 +0200 From: Thomas de Grenier de Latour To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20030904221405.6f2b9f22.degrenier@easyconnect.fr> In-Reply-To: <20030904214530.1d18c60d.cam@cameuh.net> References: <200309041251.49718.vapier@gentoo.org> <20030904175911.GA1161@breccia.escarpment> <20030904200705.72bb2b53.cam@cameuh.net> <200309041502.33601.vapier@gentoo.org> <20030904214530.1d18c60d.cam@cameuh.net> Organization: Fasmz X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Breaking up the beast known as app-games X-Archives-Salt: 4de335e9-f53a-4428-8579-fe0cd473a637 X-Archives-Hash: 55e21b391a1962cc53c03fd744579aff On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 21:45:30 +0200 Camille Huot wrote: > sounds nice. I think there is some work to be done to portage to get > this working. I don't see the main difficulty in modifying portage, but rather in doing the transition to the new tree without breaking backward compatibility with old installed portage versions. There are some people, especialy those who run gentoo on production servers, who don't do their weekly deep update :/ -- TGL. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list