From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22780 invoked by uid 1002); 4 Sep 2003 03:03:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 100 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2003 03:03:31 -0000 From: Luke-Jr Organization: Gentoo Linux To: vapier@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 03:03:10 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <20030904005914.GA6591@celeborn.wh-og.hs-niederrhein.de> <200309032216.49306.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200309032216.49306.vapier@gentoo.org> GPG-Public-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD53E9583 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309040303.23233.luke-jr@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Discussion for new use-flag: dvdr X-Archives-Salt: cfee4547-6272-482c-96b1-02b1cabca56b X-Archives-Hash: b98e7bafa6964d155b9c32b539e1d582 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It shouldn't matter how many ebuilds implement the USE flags, but the scope= =20 they can affect. cdr, dvd, and dvdr all deal with hardware support, so it=20 only makes sense for them to be global... There should probably be a dvdram USE flag also, but I don't know if=20 *anything* would implement it, so maybe not. On Thursday 04 September 2003 02:16 am, Mike Frysinger wrote: > considering cdr is only used in 3 programs i really think it should be a > local use flag ... same for your dvdr use flag ... > -mike =2D --=20 Luke-Jr Developer, Gentoo Linux http://www.gentoo.org/ =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/Vqt3Zl/BHdU+lYMRAgk+AJ4wKWBxXH70mm2E7ktAzVzV0aF3JACcC8RH M8DJYDQNrj0vTLVTYm3s7K8=3D =3D63b8 =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list