On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:04:35AM +0900, Mamoru KOMACHI wrote:

> As far as I understand naming policy from Gentoo Linux documentation I
> think xdvik-22.40y_p1.ebuild is valid name (pkg = xdvik, ver = 22.40y,
> suf = p1) 

I think you are right.

> Do I misunderstand naming policy or does it belong to
> Portage bug?

File a bug and wait if it's marked as invalid :-)

> How can I make an ebuild of xdvik-22.40y1?  (I can name
> it xdvik-22.40y-r2.ebuild as the last resort :-/ )

Please don't do that. The -r? part just means versioning of the ebuild,
not of the package itself.

Bye, Patrick