public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-dev] linux-2.4.21_rc8-gss problem in kernel/sched.c
@ 2003-08-31 17:25 Jason Cooper
  2003-09-01 12:40 ` Chris Gianelloni
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jason Cooper @ 2003-08-31 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

If this has been mentioned before, please ignore.  I emerged
linux-2.4.21_rc8-gss a week or so ago and finally got around to
compiling it (need crypto to access old HD).  Found the following error:

on line 922 of kernel/sched.c there is a redefinition of
set_cpus_allowed().  It would appear to be the result of a ill-behaved
patch as it is an exact copy of the definition below it.  All that was
necessary was to delete the offending function (including 
#if CONFIG_SMP 
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */

I would submit a patch, but it doesn't seem right to patch over a 
patch? :)

Again, if this is known, please ignore.  If you need more info, please
let me know.

Thanks for putting out an awsome distro.

Cooper.

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] linux-2.4.21_rc8-gss problem in kernel/sched.c
  2003-08-31 17:25 [gentoo-dev] linux-2.4.21_rc8-gss problem in kernel/sched.c Jason Cooper
@ 2003-09-01 12:40 ` Chris Gianelloni
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chris Gianelloni @ 2003-09-01 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Jason Cooper; +Cc: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1172 bytes --]

On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 13:25, Jason Cooper wrote:
> If this has been mentioned before, please ignore.  I emerged
> linux-2.4.21_rc8-gss a week or so ago and finally got around to
> compiling it (need crypto to access old HD).  Found the following error:
> 
> on line 922 of kernel/sched.c there is a redefinition of
> set_cpus_allowed().  It would appear to be the result of a ill-behaved
> patch as it is an exact copy of the definition below it.  All that was
> necessary was to delete the offending function (including 
> #if CONFIG_SMP 
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> 
> I would submit a patch, but it doesn't seem right to patch over a 
> patch? :)
> 
> Again, if this is known, please ignore.  If you need more info, please
> let me know.
> 
> Thanks for putting out an awsome distro.

The best way to take care fo this would be to file a bug on
bugs.gentoo.org and assign it to x86-kernel@gentoo.org.  That way the
kernel team will get the bug and have tracking information on it and
also an easy way to contact you and collaborate on the problem.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Games Team

Is your power animal a penguin?

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-01 12:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-08-31 17:25 [gentoo-dev] linux-2.4.21_rc8-gss problem in kernel/sched.c Jason Cooper
2003-09-01 12:40 ` Chris Gianelloni

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox