From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11431 invoked by uid 1002); 29 Aug 2003 14:19:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 17555 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2003 14:19:09 -0000 From: Luke-Jr Organization: Gentoo Linux To: dams@idm.fr Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 14:18:36 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <200308290132.16085.luke-jr@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: GPG-Public-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD53E9583 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200308291418.48569.luke-jr@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] desktop X-Archives-Salt: 4d6133af-bae8-44fe-81a0-364a787d5b7a X-Archives-Hash: bec74ed4078244b27eb30cf792df82f0 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ok that somewhat explains what 'desktop' is... But what has the *discussion= *=20 been discussing? :) On Friday 29 August 2003 02:06 pm, dams@idm.fr wrote: > Luke-Jr said: > > Could someone summarize this thread please? I'm somewhat interested in > > the discussion, but don't really have time to go through reading all 50 > > or so new messages... o.o;; > > summary attempt (please correct me if we still don't agree) > > desktop will handle the desktop component. It'll try to stick with vanilla > desktops as much as possible, but provide good default, and uniformization > when it's possible and non-intrusive. In all case, additions should be > easily (un)pluggable. > > About non visible stuff, desktop will try to make things work out of the > box. Ie, addapt config/default data so that they better interact with > gentoo core system. > > Some questions to answer : > > - do we want X in desktop or in base or elsewhere? it seems we tend to put > X in base, but not included in default system > > - should we have rules to decide if such modification will change the DE > too much from vanilla state? > > - probably other things, but my head is in a bad state right now =2D --=20 Luke-Jr Developer, Gentoo Linux http://www.gentoo.org/ =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQE/T2DFZl/BHdU+lYMRAs++AJiMQdQA2aQxWRqaqeuO22/77AARAJkBj1TW lVvuVtDKyOpkMMYfonAZIA=3D=3D =3DpCiP =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list