From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16199 invoked by uid 1002); 29 Aug 2003 14:37:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 15796 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2003 14:37:50 -0000 From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 23:17:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <1062076911.3455.116.camel@rivendell> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_WFnT//F3brdmbw8"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200308282317.10879.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0 X-Spam-Level: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] desktop X-Archives-Salt: 8aef7ea2-c33b-45c8-84e2-0a1fa35e11be X-Archives-Hash: ca2e8455e29ad974f6354ad4affb8835 --Boundary-02=_WFnT//F3brdmbw8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 28 August 2003 16:59, dams@idm.fr wrote: > hmm, I have to say : they are not bright most of the cases :) When you ha= ve > to handle customers, the reality may affraid If they were, they would be developers themselves ;-) Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --Boundary-02=_WFnT//F3brdmbw8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/TnFWbKx5DBjWFdsRAh7iAJwN6zMfCEfyTXCzIW5jlp4iLiaf1wCfUf7O mDnZGuoG2Dgok1N/Iog8IfI= =d7a+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_WFnT//F3brdmbw8--