From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-6192-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 3794 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Aug 2003 19:23:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 16417 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2003 19:23:26 -0000
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 21:23:39 +0200
From: Spider <spider@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Message-Id: <20030828212339.13ba9c35.spider@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <1062097524.5003.15.camel@uranus.atlantica>
References: <1062097524.5003.15.camel@uranus.atlantica>
Organization: Gentoo
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="=.jaW'j2qk_tAmQK"
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] x11-base/xfree should be virtual/x11
X-Archives-Salt: 7598112b-1d45-4c1c-9049-45639cf2f422
X-Archives-Hash: e8497c55cb98e20173bcb829d1ff57d6

--=.jaW'j2qk_tAmQK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

begin  quote
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 21:05:24 +0200
Jasmin Buchert <jasmin@atlantica.ch> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I submitted a bugreport today saying that all x11-base/xfree DEPEND's
> should be virtual/x11. But my bugzilla bugreport (Bug #27479) was
> reject with the reason: "open up bugs for specific packages" ->
> INVALID. What now? Should I make a script that greps for packages with
> x11-base/xfree and let it make automatic bugzilla bug requests? ;)
> 

Be more specific.  virtual/x11 may provide xlib, but may not provide
extentions such as XRENDER and other "necessary" things for a modern
desktop.  This is something that makes a package-by-package decision
necessary.


I agree that the bugresolver could have been more verbose, but its
generally correct.

//Spider


-- 
begin  .signature
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end

--=.jaW'j2qk_tAmQK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/Tla8ZS9CZTi033kRAu5VAJ9nkGZF4U3gixF19Lr/BYQhAY6waQCeN0F2
MuNXP9G97HcmSPpCjGzrM2E=
=kqM6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=.jaW'j2qk_tAmQK--