From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6511 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Aug 2003 19:14:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 26019 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2003 19:14:40 -0000 From: Peter Ruskin Organization: Retired To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 20:14:34 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <200308281600.13232.pauldv@gentoo.org> <20030828194416.189ef484.spider@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030828194416.189ef484.spider@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200308282014.34767.aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] desktop X-Archives-Salt: 8197fc55-5f42-4254-845d-431588fb9dbf X-Archives-Hash: 23db65313c3251684113bd39e2883211 On Thursday 28 Aug 2003 18:44, Spider wrote: > 6) intra-DE modifications > I'm all for the various DE's implementing or removing features, as > long as its maintainable, and sane. Adding highstrung pipedreams > that can't be made to work properly is not our thing. Leave this to > Mandrake, SuSE and RedHat. They are good at it. I agree wholeheartedly with everything you said in this mail, Spider; especially point 6. BTW, dams used to work at Mandrake - it shows. Peter -- ====================================================================== Gentoo: Portage 2.0.48-r5 (default-x86-1.4, gcc-3.2.3, glibc-2.3.2-r1) kernel-2.4.22_pre2-gss i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1600+ ====================================================================== -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list