From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18231 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Aug 2003 08:17:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 24177 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2003 08:17:09 -0000 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 17:17:06 +0900 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030828081705.GA21085%chutz@gg3.net> References: <200308280258.38262.steve@stevesworld.hopto.org> <200308280110.31042.iggy@gentoo.org> <200308280445.16738.steve@stevesworld.hopto.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200308280445.16738.steve@stevesworld.hopto.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i-ja.1 From: Georgi Georgiev Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.80 (Determine) X-Primary-Address: chutz@gg3.net Reply-To: Georgi Georgiev Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] VMware workstation 4.0.1 Problem X-Archives-Salt: 21504274-5bd3-47a8-bfb2-8a76c9b80abc X-Archives-Hash: 15246f5531b4e3bf714035684301e257 On 28/08/2003 at 04:45:15(-0300), Stephen Clowater used 2.8K just to say: > Vmware people told me that it should work fine on a red hat box, wich is all > they support. As you can guess, it is hard for Gentoo devs to debug a problem with a commercial product. Everyone would have to buy it and it is not really cheap. I'd say this is the responsibility of vmware. Also, take a look at this: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt top of page 4. -- (* Georgi Georgiev (* share, n.: To give in, endure humiliation. (* *) chutz@gg3.net *) *) (* +81(90)6266-1163 (* (* -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list