From: Matt Chorman <matt@legalizefreedom.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] European Patentability rules
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 14:35:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200308271435.43103.matt@legalizefreedom.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030827231334.4d70b88d.pYrania@c0ffeine.de>
On Wednesday 27 August 2003 02:13 pm, Markus Nigbur wrote:
> On 27 Aug 2003 22:33:32 +0200
> Aug 27 21:34:17 * klieber happens to support software patents.
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
It's amazing to me that any open-source developer would agree with software
patents. Just on a random search of the US patent office, I found that I (and
probably each and every one of you) are guilty of patent infringment - daily.
Have you ever used a computer to initiate a remote session - ssh? vnc? X?
Look up patent 6,611,865. Be thankful HP hasn't started suing everyone under
the sun.
While you're at it, look up 6,611,268. Then look up all patents where the
Assignee is Microsoft or HP. Then think about the implications of the SCO
lawsuit and what these companies can do if the courts don't reject SCO's
argument. There is a major differnese between software patents and
copyrights. Copyright=good. Software patent=bad.
/me crawls back into his hole
--
Matt
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7D81740A
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-27 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-27 20:33 [gentoo-dev] European Patentability rules Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-08-27 21:13 ` Markus Nigbur
2003-08-27 21:35 ` Matt Chorman [this message]
2003-08-28 1:44 ` Stuart Herbert
2003-08-28 4:10 ` Luke-Jr
2003-08-28 10:29 ` Stuart Herbert
2003-08-28 11:27 ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-08-28 8:59 ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-08-28 11:28 ` Stuart Herbert
2003-08-28 9:29 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-08-28 13:49 ` Lars Weiler
2003-08-28 16:03 ` Philippe Lafoucrière
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-27 22:48 Joshua Brindle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200308271435.43103.matt@legalizefreedom.org \
--to=matt@legalizefreedom.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox