From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9091 invoked by uid 1002); 27 Aug 2003 09:19:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 29673 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2003 09:19:05 -0000 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:40:42 +0300 From: Svyatogor To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20030827124042.275ba6ef.svyatogor@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030818162436.2863ef2d.weeve@gentoo.org> References: <20030818162436.2863ef2d.weeve@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="=.w:A'LqVY)wCUju" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Email Overload; Make summaries and bugs for test requests X-Archives-Salt: db5f86c5-d422-4b2a-9f7e-8c44bde34d99 X-Archives-Hash: d5ee68eaeec2971a912f6cfaea99d367 --=.w:A'LqVY)wCUju Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Why do I have a feeling this is another "great proposal" which everyone agreed with but didn't bother to go further and suggest it's implementation? Can someone update me on the status? Probably a GLEP is required, then I could right it. On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 16:24:36 -0400 Jason Wever wrote: > Hi All, > > Since our -dev mailing list is now receiving an enormous amount of > traffic each day, I'd like to suggest bringing/bring back up the > summaries idea previously mentioned a few months ago. Due to the fact > that we all have limited time to work on Gentoo, and we can't spend > all of it reading the 50+ emails on -dev every day (not to mention > other list(s) we may be on).. So please, if a thread ends up resulting > in something devs need to read(i.e. policy changes), please make a > summary email. > > Also, for sparc, if you want us to test something, it is *HIGHLY > SUGGESTED* that you make a bug for it and CC the sparc team on it > . As I've mentioned in the above paragraph about > email overload, it's easy for your test request to get lost in the > shuffle(especially if it's at the top of the 50+ emails to read). > This will guarantee the best response from the team. If you want to > do whatever with your ebuild(s) in the test request by a certain date, > please indicate that in the bug. > > Thanks, > -- > Jason Wever > Gentoo/Sparc Team Lead > -- Let the Force be with us! Sergey Kuleshov Public Key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~sergey/gentoo-gpg --=.w:A'LqVY)wCUju Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/THygbYNN+aDJgscRAsYhAJ9a6Me9GtRU5yAfXxRAfsM0tbhUfQCdHqs2 5bCwZ145u3FGeSnQbiEoyis= =YAJ6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.w:A'LqVY)wCUju--