From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13927 invoked by uid 1002); 27 Aug 2003 07:27:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 8615 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2003 07:27:37 -0000 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 03:27:35 -0400 From: Jon Portnoy To: Thomas de Grenier de Latour Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030827072735.GA30815@cerberus.oppresses.us> References: <3F4BE61E.50600@technaut.darktalker.net> <200308261902.03839.cedric@neopeak.com> <20030827000837.GA6635@enki.datanode.net> <20030827001535.GA8840@cerberus.oppresses.us> <20030827091124.23079e69.degrenier@easyconnect.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030827091124.23079e69.degrenier@easyconnect.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] uninstalling packages with portage X-Archives-Salt: 78842e41-7cdf-4512-8543-6e81eef5a4b6 X-Archives-Hash: 9e8346b501b84808ff972fac3f5a1c24 On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:11:24AM +0200, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: [snip] > > Good news, there is big issue on my list: > > - openmotif vs. lesstif: a well known one. Almost all files are in both > packages. I would vote for a mutual exclusion, because it doesn't > makes sense to have both installed (one breaks the other). And in case > of updates, the user will sometimes get lesstif, sometimes openmotif... > (and don't ask why both where installed on my system, I have no idea) Er, they already block each other and dependencies should be on virtual/motif... > - sys-apps/coreutils-5.0-r2 vs. sys-apps/shadow-4.0.3-r7 on /bin/groups > (is it supposed to be the same program in both > packages?) > > - dev-tcltk/expect-5.37.1-r1 vs. net-misc/whois-4.6.6-r2 on > /usr/bin/mkpasswd (same question) > Both of these are probably just about the same; functionally speaking, they're extremely basic applications. > - app-admin/etcat-0.1 vs. app-portage/gentoolkit-0.1.30: couldn't the > separate package (etcat) be removed? > Already is.-- Jon Portnoy avenj/irc.freenode.net -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list