From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17771 invoked by uid 1002); 25 Aug 2003 13:46:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 25757 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2003 13:46:15 -0000 From: Luke-Jr Organization: Gentoo Linux To: azarah@gentoo.org Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 13:46:03 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: Yuri Enshin , Gentoo-Dev References: <20030823210429.57e7e85c.genone@genone.de> <200308250219.08409.luke-jr@gentoo.org> <1061786818.13460.40.camel@nosferatu.lan> In-Reply-To: <1061786818.13460.40.camel@nosferatu.lan> GPG-Public-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD53E9583 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="shift_jis" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200308251346.12904.luke-jr@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] reason for dhcpcd in system profile ? X-Archives-Salt: b22d3c2d-6def-4532-b892-50fc23788a82 X-Archives-Hash: 55d86d640b311eb2191f3b767e4b9c5d =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 25 August 2003 04:46 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 04:18, Luke-Jr wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Sunday 24 August 2003 08:15 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > > Man pages is an integrate part of a system in my opinion - how anyhow > > > are you going to tell them to RTFM if not there :P > > > > Have the install manual suggest installation of them. > > O.K. > > > > > ext2/ext3 are still considered Linux native, so that may be > > > > justification for their inclusion in system, if not for the fact th= at > > > > reiserfs is a bad idea for a /boot partition... I wouldn't have any > > > > objection to their removal from system, though. > > > > > > e2fsprogs provide /sbin/fsck ... 8) > > > > fsck, unless I'm mistaken, merely detects the filesystem and runs > > fsck.{ext3,xfs,reiserfs,etc}. It could probably be provided by all > > packages which provide a fsck, or baselayout. > > Ok, and who wants to bloat now ? I have diff filesystems on diff > partition depending on what it is used for (and I bet I am not the > only one). > > I also guess you are going to rip fsck, or code a new one, and maintain > it for all ... fsck is merely a redirector to the proper fsck.* program. There's no real=20 reason it needs to be provided by a specific filesystem's package. =2D --=20 Luke-Jr Developer, Gentoo Linux http://www.gentoo.org/ =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/ShMfZl/BHdU+lYMRAuQuAJsHypZByqOGgPdmlDGcW6+bxpf9bgCggC3V +sFB+0uq69spZOclJzw8sr0=3D =3Dd1V0 =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list