From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27902 invoked by uid 1002); 24 Aug 2003 20:40:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 23929 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2003 20:40:01 -0000 Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 22:40:16 +0200 From: Spider To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20030824224016.235193af.spider@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Y5Q_NrYk=.QyJbd?" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] reason for dhcpcd in system profile ? X-Archives-Salt: 13065146-4633-4276-98fb-f4a6fa982ab0 X-Archives-Hash: 5ed48c25feda821390439e004ba95e47 --Y5Q_NrYk=.QyJbd? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ok, this breaks threading but I just got a bounce due to wrong sender address, (having mailprobs) --- begin quote On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 20:16:07 +0200 Paul de Vrieze wrote: > On Sunday 24 August 2003 18:44, Spider wrote: > > begin quote > > On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:32:22 -0500 > > > > lpr > > > > But, Am I the only one who sees an advantage in moving the default > > profiles to LSB compliance, and providing an alternated "light" one > > for the cases that want them? (heck, if you dislike dhcpcd I'm > > pretty sure you don't want the bloat of glibc either, go for uclibc. > > ;) but sarcasm > > aside, the suggestion is serious. > > Well, I can see the advantage of mimmicing the LSB, but for example > lpr does not make sense without a printer, and setting up a printer > takes configuring anyway so I don't feel it should be part of system Here we can disagree, as the LSB defines lpr, it can well be just an offline printer (print-to-file setup) which can very well be configured per default. However, if we wish to include it in the basic profile or not is another question. I still think that doing so (or posix compliance, see thread about bloat.) could provide to be a benefit for the project. //Spider -- begin .signature This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. end --Y5Q_NrYk=.QyJbd? Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/SSKzZS9CZTi033kRAo5UAKCnfDPjhKCz5413izqZOCDiNxbzuwCeNtiZ eyPVKqyAZ/84HfBoSCqWEkQ= =XO8C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Y5Q_NrYk=.QyJbd?--