From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-6012-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 18975 invoked by uid 1002); 24 Aug 2003 18:16:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 20052 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2003 18:16:38 -0000
From: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 20:16:07 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2
References: <20030823210429.57e7e85c.genone@genone.de> <1061742742.1727.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20030824184416.3b046b59.spider@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030824184416.3b046b59.spider@gentoo.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1;
  boundary="Boundary-02=_xDQS/u8zM/2YRIn";
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200308242016.17397.pauldv@gentoo.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.7 required=5.0
	tests=BAYES_10,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
	      USER_AGENT_KMAIL
	autolearn=ham version=2.55-uvt3
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55-uvt3 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS-ng (Milter interface)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] reason for dhcpcd in system profile ?
X-Archives-Salt: d7e19b1d-a7e2-4450-b917-955e8c970e6d
X-Archives-Hash: de824fa606351d77d89630dc99372cdc

--Boundary-02=_xDQS/u8zM/2YRIn
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sunday 24 August 2003 18:44, Spider wrote:
> begin  quote
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:32:22 -0500

> > lpr
>
> But,  Am I the only one who sees an advantage in moving the default
> profiles to LSB compliance, and providing an alternated "light" one for
> the cases that want them? (heck, if you dislike dhcpcd I'm pretty sure
> you don't want the bloat of glibc either, go for uclibc.  ;) but sarcasm
> aside,  the suggestion is serious.

Well, I can see the advantage of mimmicing the LSB, but for example lpr doe=
s=20
not make sense without a printer, and setting up a printer takes configurin=
g=20
anyway so I don't feel it should be part of system

Paul

=2D-=20
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net

--Boundary-02=_xDQS/u8zM/2YRIn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/SQDxbKx5DBjWFdsRAk9NAKDpfpPTQmEiwDDu2sr+aXHAH8O2NQCg4sq+
Z7QfA+ghb2/0n9ubhF1L6Og=
=TfIP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_xDQS/u8zM/2YRIn--