From: Wolfram Schlich <lists@schlich.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] reason for dhcpcd in system profile ?
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 23:20:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030823212051.ALLYOURBASEAREBELONGTOUS.E11963@bla.fasel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030823222331.726bc9b4.daniel.armyr@home.se>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 989 bytes --]
* Daniel Armyr <daniel.armyr@home.se> [2003-08-23 22:28]:
> > Anyway, if you didn't ;), I'd say dhcpcd is worth keeping in the
> > system profile because I think it's "universal". It doesn't hurt the
> > non-dhcp users. Imagine you have just installed Gentoo on a notebook.
> > You have set it up at home where you aren't using dhcp. But then you
> > go to some location where you just need dhcp because otherwise you
> > cannot use the network. What would you do when you'd discover there's
> > no dhcpcd installed yet? Well, of course you know it better next time,
> > but I think it's nicer when it's just there by default :)
>
> A valid point, but I thought that was what we have Mandrake for...
Argh :-P
Why not remove "hdparm" as well from the system profile, because lots
of people are using SCSI drives... or "openssh" because lots of people
don't log in remotely over networks... well.
--
Wolfram Schlich; Friedhofstr. 8, D-88069 Tettnang; +49-(0)178-SCHLICH
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-23 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-23 19:04 [gentoo-dev] reason for dhcpcd in system profile ? Marius Mauch
2003-08-23 19:20 ` Wolfram Schlich
2003-08-23 20:23 ` Daniel Armyr
2003-08-23 21:20 ` Wolfram Schlich [this message]
2003-08-24 6:08 ` Daniel Armyr
2003-08-23 23:06 ` Luke-Jr
2003-08-24 3:21 ` A. Craig West
2003-08-24 8:59 ` Spider
2003-08-24 16:32 ` Alec Berryman
2003-08-24 16:44 ` Spider
2003-08-24 18:16 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-08-24 18:40 ` Alec Berryman
2003-08-24 18:55 ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-08-24 18:47 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-08-24 19:05 ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-08-24 19:03 ` Marius Mauch
2003-08-25 0:44 ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-08-25 0:48 ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-08-24 22:00 ` Grant Goodyear
2003-08-25 3:07 ` Luke-Jr
2003-08-23 19:29 ` Stewart Honsberger
2003-08-23 20:29 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-08-24 7:22 ` Stewart Honsberger
2003-08-24 8:33 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-08-24 15:09 ` Brad Laue
2003-08-24 20:41 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-08-23 21:25 ` Norberto BENSA
2003-08-23 20:34 ` Yuri Enshin
2003-08-23 21:27 ` Norberto BENSA
2003-08-23 23:16 ` Luke-Jr
2003-08-24 8:15 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-08-25 2:18 ` Luke-Jr
2003-08-25 4:24 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-08-25 4:46 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-08-25 13:46 ` Luke-Jr
2003-08-25 16:27 ` William Hubbs
2003-08-23 23:08 ` Lloyd D Budd
2003-08-24 4:28 ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-08-24 14:14 ` Marius Mauch
2003-08-24 14:33 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-08-24 15:09 ` Paul de Vrieze
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-24 20:40 Spider
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030823212051.ALLYOURBASEAREBELONGTOUS.E11963@bla.fasel.org \
--to=lists@schlich.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox