From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19395 invoked by uid 1002); 23 Aug 2003 12:49:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 25901 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2003 12:49:50 -0000 Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 14:49:52 +0200 From: Marius Mauch To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20030823144952.3477bb6c.genone@genone.de> In-Reply-To: <86smns4r8l.fsf@speedy.ps.uni-sb.de> References: <20030822191939.36400b90.genone@genone.de> <20030822184545.GF20817@james.is.never.wrong.nu> <1061579054.415.206.camel@vertigo> <86smns4r8l.fsf@speedy.ps.uni-sb.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4claws35 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-security] GLEP #14: security updates based on GLSA X-Archives-Salt: cb0c72e1-99f7-489e-b865-c00ca31c0ef1 X-Archives-Hash: 41dde76c1a9389dc11888b71698b01a2 On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 12:12:42 +0200 Denys Duchier wrote: > Chris Gianelloni writes: > > > YYYYMMDD is the ISO standard for dates, and I think all dates in > > Gentoo should be using this widely accepted standard. > > The ISO 8601 standard for dates recommends YYYY-MM-DD. It also > states: "the hyphens can be omitted if compactness of the > representation is more important than human readability". I doubt > this level of compactness is warranted here. We should go with the > more readable format. Ok, I updated the code and the sample to use the YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM format. Marius -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list