From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17555 invoked by uid 1002); 21 Aug 2003 10:52:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 15937 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2003 10:52:52 -0000 From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 12:52:41 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <20030821040916.GE26885@squish.home.loc> <20030821050925.GA3277@cerberus.oppresses.us> <20030821070040.GA4889@inventor.gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030821070040.GA4889@inventor.gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_DSKR/7Oyj7fA1fJ"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200308211252.51016.pauldv@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Why should copyright assignment be a requirement? X-Archives-Salt: 1e7e877e-61d8-415f-a3be-2c92e67857b3 X-Archives-Hash: 87d722ca4dfbda31c2e0391394dee37e --Boundary-02=_DSKR/7Oyj7fA1fJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 21 August 2003 09:00, Daniel Robbins wrote: There is one aditional point that I think we should request of the other=20 copyright owners, that is there should be contact information included in=20 some way. An email address is enough for that. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --Boundary-02=_DSKR/7Oyj7fA1fJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/RKSCbKx5DBjWFdsRAqDTAJ4/QXUdlPcupSv1Lb0cxkl7RYxkDACdFaOQ NeeoKGa3gkCyPvn+GuxcVEo= =9spD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_DSKR/7Oyj7fA1fJ--