From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31820 invoked by uid 1002); 19 Aug 2003 23:51:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 3893 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2003 23:51:24 -0000 Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:51:21 -0400 From: Owen Gunden To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030819235121.GA5978@force.stwing.upenn.edu> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <1061333257.14174.2.camel@localhost> <200308200108.34719.scandium@gentoo.org> <1061335558.14357.7.camel@localhost> <200308200132.48140.scandium@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200308200132.48140.scandium@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Security Problems: xmule, lmule X-Archives-Salt: 669f4f01-919f-459d-a7a8-a165d9335c51 X-Archives-Hash: fce8acc9e16815693209a4f92f4edc74 On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 01:32:47AM +0200, Rainer Groesslinger wrote: > > > I added an einfo about the security hole in all the xmule ebuilds > > > and I hope they release 1.4.4 or something soon (which will > > > immediatly be arch of course) > > > > That's good, but I don't think it's adequate since not everybody > > reinstalls xmule every day _and_ reads all einfo lines scrolling by. > > that einfo is at pkg_postinst() so everbody should see it (at least if > nothing else is merged immediatly afterwards ;) Further motivation for my functions.sh patch or similar :). See the thread entitled "patch: emergemail feature in functions.sh". How timely. Owen -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list