From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13094 invoked by uid 1002); 19 Aug 2003 22:35:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 24714 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2003 22:35:41 -0000 From: Mike Frysinger Reply-To: vapier@gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:35:44 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <200308191656.50226.vapier@gentoo.org> <1061331578.11869.78.camel@simple> In-Reply-To: <1061331578.11869.78.camel@simple> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200308191835.44977.vapier@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] deprecating libnet-1.0.x (it's about time) X-Archives-Salt: e4a7984f-602f-4769-b126-b4ab11b8bb82 X-Archives-Hash: 0cfe41f46c4c7e77a3d50ae3be42d46b On Tuesday 19 August 2003 18:19, Ned Ludd wrote: > > net-analyzer/hogwash (this needs a lot of work ...) > > I co develop hogwash and the 0.4 series has been depreciated and is > probably exploitable. Now at the current time the 0.5 series is the > current, but probably not ideal for use in portage yet. > I would recommend that it be removed until 0.5 is officially released or > cvs snapshots can be taken. yeah, i looked through the ebuilds/homepage and just gave up on trying to 'fix' it ... glad to know we've got someone who knows a lot about it ;) i'd ask you to do it since you are the much more knowledable person ... basically, like you said, i'd remove all the ebuilds and add in 0.5 and either ~ or package.mask it ... -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list