From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15749 invoked by uid 1002); 17 Aug 2003 13:15:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 25553 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2003 13:15:04 -0000 Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 15:15:26 +0200 From: Spider To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20030817151526.056f2f54.spider@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030817083228.GC16981@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> References: <20030817075537.GA16981@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <20030817010833.12f78a3d.seemant@gentoo.org> <20030817083228.GC16981@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="wA?=.a=RG?dIkK24" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: split tcltk USE flag to tcl and tk X-Archives-Salt: 112d174c-843a-468e-8609-16dbd0acc3c0 X-Archives-Hash: 4760776b290cde8ed9ce94cef10ab048 --wA?=.a=RG?dIkK24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit begin quote On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 01:32:28 -0700 "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > > Two possible solutions for this: > 1. Have the 'tk' USE flag imply the 'tcl' USE flag. This would cause > the'tcl? ( tcl ) tk? ( tk )' example to resolve correctly. > 2. the ebuilds doing 'tcl? ( tcl ) tk? ( tk )' are quite clearly > wrong, as tk is the graphical toolkit for tcl, ergo they should have > 'IUSE="tk"' and that would pull in tcl as wel We have that with gtk and gtk2, and users don't understand it. We are at about 1 bug report / week for that due to the nesting (one turn on/off and one prefer-gtk2) I'd still prefer that the python ebuild was fixed to be: DEPEND="tcltk? ( X? ( >=dev-lang/tk-8.4 )) " instead of breaking it further. //Spider -- begin .signature This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. end --wA?=.a=RG?dIkK24 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/P3/wZS9CZTi033kRAiSmAKCWr10FNgfgxfof11mT6TP6eqiL9QCcCH9f T3zUfMHONW/o9JIcnFa8amM= =KFfU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wA?=.a=RG?dIkK24--