From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6613 invoked by uid 1002); 17 Aug 2003 16:02:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 25208 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2003 16:02:07 -0000 From: George Shapovalov Organization: Gentoo Linux To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 09:01:10 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <20030817075537.GA16981@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <20030817010833.12f78a3d.seemant@gentoo.org> <20030817083228.GC16981@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> In-Reply-To: <20030817083228.GC16981@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200308170901.11099.george@gentoo.org> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 tagged_above=-100000.0 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION, IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, USER_AGENT_KMAIL X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: split tcltk USE flag to tcl and tk X-Archives-Salt: 0d5e581e-a8e6-4312-b77a-551ae18769cc X-Archives-Hash: 62d6f0d1d720162f5b92790ce483e7f6 On Sunday 17 August 2003 01:32, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Two possible solutions for this: > 1. Have the 'tk' USE flag imply the 'tcl' USE flag. This would cause the > 'tcl? ( tcl ) tk? ( tk )' example to resolve correctly. Perhaps then it should be called tcltk ;). Thus looks like just maintaining tcltk flag and adding plain "tcl" for the cases where tk is not needed or desired should resolve this.. George -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list