From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-5680-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 12739 invoked by uid 1002); 16 Aug 2003 02:03:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 22481 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2003 02:03:58 -0000
From: Mystilleef <mystilleef@yifan.net>
Reply-To: mystilleef@yifan.net
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 21:52:52 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200308152152.53346.mystilleef@yifan.net>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Why is KDE-3.1.3 not in the stable branch of Portage yet?
X-Archives-Salt: 0a4a9a7e-f2db-451f-860e-841c0147a46d
X-Archives-Hash: 8b62330361747fbde9bee185acd8d9a9

On Fri 15 August 2003 08:29, Paul wrote
>The reason is basically because there have been some auto{conf,make} related 
>issues with the ebuilds. While they should be fixed now we want to know it 
>for sure before marking kde stable. Please test it out though, if it compiles 
>for you it is stable.

>Paul

Hello again,

Thanks for your prompt response. I'm off to test it out.

Regards,

Mystilleef


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list