public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "C. Brewer" <cbrewer@stealthaccess.net>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4 final against rc's
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 23:30:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030814233037.52e7a4d9.cbrewer@stealthaccess.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200308142006.08912.klasikahl@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1057 bytes --]

 I'd like to say I've always considered the version cat'd into
/etc/gentoo-release as the definitive version. Since packages change every
day, baselayout is certainly more rare in it's updates. Considering that,
and that fact that on a baselayout update most,if not sometimes all, of your
core configuration files are either altered or presented for trivial
updates, I consider this to be true versioning. I also believe that the rc
should be changed to prc (packaged release candidate) solely on the fact
that it is just basically a prepacked timesaver for the regular joe. The
ambitious have and will continue to either burn their own stage one-three or
get the tarballs and hack it together in their own fashion. I think the
change to prc would reflect the " this is the approved package set-up during
the 1.4 phase of baselayout " rather than the "oh no, a new version,we gotta
upgrade " paranoia.

Or I could be paranoid myself.....



-- 
Chuck Brewer
Registered Linux User #284015
Get my gpg public key at pgp.mit.edu!! Encrypted e-mail preferred.



[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2003-08-15  6:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-14 19:56 [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4 final against rc's FRLinux
2003-08-14 20:58 ` Spider
2003-08-14 22:20   ` Owen Gunden
2003-08-14 23:08     ` Peter Ruskin
2003-08-15  3:06     ` Zack Gilburd
2003-08-15  6:30       ` C. Brewer [this message]
2003-08-15  9:44     ` Camille Huot
2003-08-15  9:54       ` Georgi Georgiev
2003-08-15 10:06         ` Phil Richards
2003-08-15 13:30           ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-08-15 16:41             ` Georgi Georgiev
2003-08-15 11:46         ` William Kenworthy
2003-08-15 13:11       ` Michael Cummings
2003-08-15 17:00         ` matt c
2003-08-15 17:27           ` Todd Berman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-15 17:39 matt c
2003-08-15 17:47 ` Todd Berman
2003-08-15 18:10   ` Paul de Vrieze

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030814233037.52e7a4d9.cbrewer@stealthaccess.net \
    --to=cbrewer@stealthaccess.net \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox