From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25501 invoked by uid 1002); 14 Aug 2003 20:58:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 7607 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2003 20:58:09 -0000 Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 22:58:35 +0200 From: Spider To: frlinux@gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20030814225835.74ee794b.spider@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <1060890969.4386.34.camel@localhost> References: <1060890969.4386.34.camel@localhost> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="=.0e/dkaJG''2Llm" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4 final against rc's X-Archives-Salt: 608972f8-1587-4580-8202-cade05bf839c X-Archives-Hash: efc69f25b0bf23191a7ca78724f98fd8 --=.0e/dkaJG''2Llm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit begin quote On 14 Aug 2003 20:56:09 +0100 FRLinux wrote: > Hello, > > Got a quick question, got several systems running Gentoo 1.4rc2/3 and > been updating them using : emerge -U world so they seems quite up to > date concerning gcc and glibc. > > What pros would you see in actually scratching the system to a 1.4 > final? > None, there wouldn't be any difference at all in your system. 1.4 is the package release and the livecd's, not the resulting systems. //Spider -- begin .signature This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. end --=.0e/dkaJG''2Llm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/O/f9ZS9CZTi033kRAmlJAKCFfW012nrdp6oM87QCnD5tELuDxACdF5zb oQK1kdiieOgp7BC43MmCWwQ= =LNSB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.0e/dkaJG''2Llm--