From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2735 invoked by uid 1002); 14 Aug 2003 22:20:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 19580 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2003 22:20:30 -0000 Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 18:20:27 -0400 From: Owen Gunden To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030814222026.GA16720@force.stwing.upenn.edu> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <1060890969.4386.34.camel@localhost> <20030814225835.74ee794b.spider@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030814225835.74ee794b.spider@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4 final against rc's X-Archives-Salt: fb22ae89-19f6-4d16-b050-5423f14e3d83 X-Archives-Hash: 371b2f7739b929b41415aec055cb1e46 On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:58:35PM +0200, Spider wrote: > None, there wouldn't be any difference at all in your system. 1.4 is > the package release and the livecd's, not the resulting systems. This kind of question comes up all the time. I often wonder if it's not a waste of effort to try and force gentoo into a notion of "releases", when it's so unnatural to do so. It would be cool to come up with some other, more gentoo-ish way of expressing progress in the distribution. Ideas anyone? Or am I being a total kook? Owen -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list