From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27680 invoked by uid 1002); 14 Aug 2003 10:02:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 11661 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2003 10:02:49 -0000 From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:02:35 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <1060781901.7508.17.camel@biproc> <20030813161718.GC26229@ufies.org> <1060806773.19236.8.camel@vertigo> In-Reply-To: <1060806773.19236.8.camel@vertigo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_H51O/Rb+a5++UJu"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200308141202.47454.pauldv@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] "Distro Day (Measuring the benefits of the Gentoo approach)" X-Archives-Salt: 2029ca68-d551-4e31-ba03-6b7e1efd986b X-Archives-Hash: 213b7c05ae85bfd5a2c1d8e31aaf39aa --Boundary-02=_H51O/Rb+a5++UJu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 13 August 2003 22:32, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 12:17, Alan wrote: > > Maybe prelink should be used all the time on gentoo? Make it part of > > the "default" so that it's always there and able to make things even > > faster. > > I have some serious doubts about the stability of prelink. I have > recently had 2 separate systems get hosed by using prelink. Luckily, I > had one system which had not been prelinked and everything has distcc, > so I was able to "repair" my system by using the working machine. One > of my friends has had the same issue, so it is not limited to me and my > setups. I am trying to track down the problem's origin so I can file a > decent bug report. I tried out prelink myself too, and stopped using it precisely for this=20 reason. It does not appear to be stable for me either. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --Boundary-02=_H51O/Rb+a5++UJu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/O15HbKx5DBjWFdsRAjQ/AJ4l49Vhsr3izXxuGKA8YozAnws9CACg5D9P w1u+LONRLZGkWbPOKmEOjjs= =FwTX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_H51O/Rb+a5++UJu--