From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13086 invoked by uid 1002); 13 Aug 2003 20:02:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 2169 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2003 20:02:15 -0000 From: Mike Frysinger Reply-To: vapier@gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 16:02:15 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <1060781901.7508.17.camel@biproc> <20030813162432.7decc94e.dholm@gentoo.org> <20030813190003.GA21782@cerberus.oppresses.us> In-Reply-To: <20030813190003.GA21782@cerberus.oppresses.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200308131602.15965.vapier@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] "Distro Day (Measuring the benefits of the Gentoo approach)" X-Archives-Salt: 6f04c03b-1e51-4aa3-b353-ffbcb60eb0f6 X-Archives-Hash: 6ca5c0bfdf64d94037255465d331b5f7 On Wednesday 13 August 2003 15:00, Jon Portnoy wrote: > At the moment Zadeh and einride are working on ICC integration. einride > has some excellent ideas about Portage integration, so hopefully that'll > get us somewhere. hopefully the idea isnt icc-centric ... that is, it'll support say uclibc compiler, or dietlibc, or tcc, or what have you :) -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list