public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Svyatogor <svyatogor@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP #10 -- Proposal for restructuring the CVS regarding documentation wrt internationalization proposal
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 16:43:10 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030812164310.17bd32bf.svyatogor@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030812124513.GD4094@mail.lieber.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2513 bytes --]

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 08:45:17 -0400
Kurt Lieber <klieber@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 08:31:08PM +0200 or thereabouts, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0010.html
> 
> > All feedback appreciated, especially from the infrastructure folks as it is
> > mainly infrastructure related.
> 
> OK, so I finally had a chance to review and think about this GLEP.  Below
> are some questions/comments that I have.
> 
> 1) I'd like Robin (robbat2) to comment on this since the primary reason for
> the GLEP seems to be better control over CVS permissions.  I know Robin has
> some ideas on how he wants to change CVS permissions, so his feedback here
> is important. (cc'd on this email)
Primary reason depends very much on you point of view. For me primary reason is 
higher level of i18n efforts, including $LANG.gentoo.org

> 
> 2) One thing that isn't clear in the GLEP.  Is
> http://www.gentoo.org/${LANGUAGE} an *exact* copy of
> http://www.gentoo.org/en/?  Or are the internationalization teams allowed
> to change things?  For the most part, I would like to ensure that we have
> one, consistent web site, so I'd like to see translations happening, but
> not alternate content per se.
> 
> You touch a bit upon this in the "Internationalized Website" but I'm still
> not clear on how it works, so some clarification would be appreciated.

This has been discussed. I believe that many translators (including FRLinux 
and me) have agreed that pure internationalization is prety much useless. I.e.
the $LANG.gentoo.org should contain not only translated items from the main page
but also any news related to their community. 

As you mentioned correctly we are trying to achieve two diff goals internationalization
and support of communities (localization). I feel that Gentoo management does not
fully understand the importance of the second goal. As Gentoo is getting more and more
popular, more communities arrise everywhere. The $LANG.gentoo.org pages have a very good
chance of becoming the leading community pages, the ones which provide the official info.
Otherwise various pages will be created elsewhere and we will not have any effect over them
and over the info they provide. 

Being an international user myself, I know how important it is to have such local support 
strcture and think that we should not miss the chance to implement.


-- 
Let the Force be with us!
Sergey Kuleshov <svyatogor@gentoo.org>
Public Key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~sergey/gentoo-gpg

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-08-12 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-04 18:31 [gentoo-dev] GLEP #10 -- Proposal for restructuring the CVS regarding documentation wrt internationalization proposal Sven Vermeulen
2003-08-05 10:18 ` Svyatogor
2003-08-05 11:43   ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-08-05 11:50     ` FRLinux
2003-08-05 12:03       ` Svyatogor
2003-08-05 13:07         ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-08-12 13:05     ` Kurt Lieber
2003-08-12 13:20       ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-08-12 13:41       ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-08-12 15:56         ` Kurt Lieber
2003-08-05 13:31 ` Lisa Marie Seelye
2003-08-05 13:25   ` Svyatogor
2003-08-05 14:15   ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-08-05 15:21   ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-08-05 19:51     ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-08-06  8:06       ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-08-12 12:45 ` Kurt Lieber
2003-08-12 13:36   ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-08-12 13:43   ` Svyatogor [this message]
2003-08-12 21:56   ` Robin H. Johnson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030812164310.17bd32bf.svyatogor@gentoo.org \
    --to=svyatogor@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox