From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21923 invoked by uid 1002); 12 Aug 2003 05:43:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 7238 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2003 05:43:54 -0000 From: Mike Frysinger Reply-To: vapier@gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 01:43:57 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <200308120041.25074.vapier@gentoo.org> <20030811223333.4a04f8f6.cbrewer@stealthaccess.net> In-Reply-To: <20030811223333.4a04f8f6.cbrewer@stealthaccess.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200308120143.57872.vapier@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] the last of netkit-base has left X-Archives-Salt: f23669f5-dbb5-4302-bf1b-f5bf94a1e407 X-Archives-Hash: b2d42d9b64c6280f5602144422f03758 On Tuesday 12 August 2003 01:33, C. Brewer wrote: > Hmm, I'm confused...I thought the original plan was for iputils to replace > netkit-base.. it did ... netkit-base provided 'ping' and 'inetd' ... iputils replaced the ping part while xinetd replaced the inetd part > Also I hope this is only a change to satisfy a virtual/inetd > and not a mandatory system package? like all virtuals, the default is xinetd, but you are not required to use xinetd ... thats why it's called a virtual ... if you have netkit-base emerged and not xinetd, then you shouldnt have xinetd pulled in -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list