public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-dev] the last of netkit-base has left
@ 2003-08-12  4:41 Mike Frysinger
  2003-08-12  5:33 ` C. Brewer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2003-08-12  4:41 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: gentoo-core

arm joined the fold tonight ...
that means xinetd has completely replaced netkit-base in all profiles as the 
default inetd server ...
start usin xinetd cause it blows inetd away !
`emerge sync ; emerge -C netkit-base` :D
-mike

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] the last of netkit-base has left
  2003-08-12  4:41 [gentoo-dev] the last of netkit-base has left Mike Frysinger
@ 2003-08-12  5:33 ` C. Brewer
  2003-08-12  5:43   ` Mike Frysinger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: C. Brewer @ 2003-08-12  5:33 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 620 bytes --]

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 00:41:25 -0400
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:

> arm joined the fold tonight ...
> that means xinetd has completely replaced netkit-base in all profiles as
> the default inetd server ...
> start usin xinetd cause it blows inetd away !
> `emerge sync ; emerge -C netkit-base` :D
> -mike

Hmm, I'm confused...I thought the original plan was for iputils to replace
netkit-base..Also I hope this is only a change to satisfy a virtual/inetd
and not a mandatory system package?

-- 
Chuck Brewer
Registered Linux User #284015
Get my gpg public key at pgp.mit.edu!! Encrypted e-mail preferred.



[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] the last of netkit-base has left
  2003-08-12  5:33 ` C. Brewer
@ 2003-08-12  5:43   ` Mike Frysinger
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2003-08-12  5:43 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On Tuesday 12 August 2003 01:33, C. Brewer wrote:
> Hmm, I'm confused...I thought the original plan was for iputils to replace
> netkit-base..

it did ... netkit-base provided 'ping' and 'inetd' ... iputils replaced the 
ping part while xinetd replaced the inetd part

> Also I hope this is only a change to satisfy a virtual/inetd
> and not a mandatory system package?

like all virtuals, the default is xinetd, but you are not required to use 
xinetd ... thats why it's called a virtual ...
if you have netkit-base emerged and not xinetd, then you shouldnt have xinetd 
pulled in
-mike

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-08-12  5:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-08-12  4:41 [gentoo-dev] the last of netkit-base has left Mike Frysinger
2003-08-12  5:33 ` C. Brewer
2003-08-12  5:43   ` Mike Frysinger

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox