From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1114 invoked by uid 1002); 11 Aug 2003 22:41:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 18293 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2003 22:41:20 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:12:07 -0400 From: Michael Cummings To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030811191207.GC32294@enki.datanode.net> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <1060130502.15424.1.camel@lisa.thedoh.com> <1060622367.1721.22.camel@lisa.thedoh.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1060622367.1721.22.camel@lisa.thedoh.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.20-gentoo-r1 i686 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-x86 arches: Is distcc-2.8-r2 stable? X-Archives-Salt: 286961a1-4421-400f-bbe3-91a17913e12c X-Archives-Hash: b94f68d2a6a624fc874c1023737a8836 On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 01:19:28PM -0400, Lisa Marie Seelye wrote: > Well since I haven't heard anything from the non-x86 people I'm going to > bump 2.8-r2 to stable on those arches and 2.9 to x86 (I'll post a formal > announcement after I get 2.10 in). *eek!!* /me hides from the fall out seriously, would not recommend it. Have you assigned bugs to the arch's for testing? x86 is easy, but for the arch's there's always a lack of manpower undercutting their ability to test new stuff - they're usually busy making sure the currently supported stuff is still working. -- -----o()o--------------------------------------------- | http://www.gentoo.org/ | #gentoo-dev on irc.freenode.net Gentoo Dev | #gentoo-perl on irc.freenode.net Perl Guy | | GnuPG Key ID: AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E -----o()o--------------------------------------------- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list