From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9285 invoked by uid 1002); 8 Aug 2003 14:51:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 20413 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2003 14:51:01 -0000 From: Luke-Jr Organization: Gentoo Linux To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 14:50:46 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 GPG-Public-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD53E9583 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200308081450.55971.luke-jr@gentoo.org> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Creation of virtual/bittorrent X-Archives-Salt: 96b147ee-7352-4458-9e3a-8518d698038b X-Archives-Hash: a46eca434e19dfca305599baf6d0f931 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There are two alternative BitTorrent clients which I am looking into adding= to=20 portage, however they all use the same commands and therefore block each=20 other (while also providing any applications w/ a standard set of commands). Are there any reasons not to make a virtual/bittorrent and have all the BT= =20 ebuilds block on virtual/bittorrent instead of modifying every one to block= =20 against all the others? =2D --=20 Luke-Jr Developer, Gentoo Linux http://www.gentoo.org/ =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/M7jKZl/BHdU+lYMRAm4aAJ9bSSta+HpGXV5iyX2iPXM2A5N3VgCbBfhb /Rt/LRxjDDVmsfvR9GeMqow=3D =3Di2OB =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list