From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12057 invoked by uid 1002); 8 Aug 2003 08:33:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 2651 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2003 08:33:58 -0000 Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 10:19:47 +0200 From: Henti Smith To: vapier@gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20030808101947.2153c2c1.bain@tcsn.co.za> In-Reply-To: <200308071859.50469.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <20030807151508.1720ea09.bain@tcsn.co.za> <200308071859.50469.vapier@gentoo.org> Organization: tcsn X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.0claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild on bugs.gentoo.org not been touched in a long time .. X-Archives-Salt: 63ca5dde-197c-4a3f-8f9d-9a815f20083e X-Archives-Hash: 505fa734ed7d23f4e9064742c0fefacf On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 18:59:49 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > lack of manpower == ebuilds sitting around ... > look at the bugs that bug-wranglers own ... theres a ton of new > packages ... > we cant exactly tell developers 'hey, this package is now yours to > maintain' I never said thats what I want. All I'm saying is some feedback would be nice. -- Henti Smith bain@tcsn.co.za Senior Administrator The Computer-Smith Networking http://www.tcsn.co.za -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list