From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27453 invoked by uid 1002); 6 Aug 2003 09:52:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 20458 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2003 09:52:13 -0000 From: Stuart Herbert Reply-To: stuart@gentoo.org To: vapier@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:50:07 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <200308060045.22996.stuart@gentoo.org> <200308060300.19087.stuart@gentoo.org> <200308052339.02302.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200308052339.02302.vapier@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_P9MM/bKsxSk1bBd"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200308061050.07606.stuart@gentoo.org> Subject: [gentoo-dev] HLDS discussion X-Archives-Salt: 6b60b125-22cc-4a94-a61b-174f5469ab06 X-Archives-Hash: 377e0b3c3c5c597f760c65cc1a6ed455 --Boundary-02=_P9MM/bKsxSk1bBd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 06 August 2003 4:38 am, Mike Frysinger wrote: > i maintain them ... and if you look at the date on the d ebuild you'll fi= nd > it was in portage a few hours after d was released ;) d's an experimental patch. Why is it the only version in portage? > as for adding back in older versions, ill look into it ... Seems a shame to have an ebuild only for a version that is well-known as=20 broken ... Especially as your ebuild for NS-2 installs the 3.1.1.0c version of NS, and= =20 (unless I've missed it in the ebuild) doesn't include the patch to make NS-= 2=20 run on 3.1.1.1d. > i'm still trying to make hlds work properly on 1.0/1.2/1.4 boxes ... glibc > seems to cause issues of course :/ libs-compat fixes that for me just fine, at least with 3.1.1.0c + boffix. I also noticed that Metamod is built from source. HLDS (which is a C++=20 program) is very sensitive to which version of GCC is used to build Metamod= =20 (and Metamods), and most people find it seg faults most of the time when=20 compiled from source. It might be worth adding an ebuild for the binary=20 release of Metamod - or talk to Will Day (metamod's author) to discuss whic= h=20 GCC & CXXFLAGS are likely to bring the most success. I'd also be very interested in seeing HLDS support the +vhosts scheme we've= =20 been discussing about webapps. Best regards, Stu =2D-=20 Stuart Herbert stuart@gentoo.o= rg Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.or= g/ Beta packages for download http://dev.gentoo.org/~stuart/package= s/ GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint =3D 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C =2D- --Boundary-02=_P9MM/bKsxSk1bBd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/MM9PDC+AuvmvxXwRAhACAJ0eIRDJwoj9q2cNG9h3tcBgdkFUHACfUSAo aclqUUIOAD/OTGpeyHnAMmU= =p5cL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_P9MM/bKsxSk1bBd--