public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stuart Herbert <stuart@gentoo.org>
To: vapier@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] HLDS discussion
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:50:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200308061050.07606.stuart@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200308052339.02302.vapier@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: signed data --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1738 bytes --]

On Wednesday 06 August 2003 4:38 am, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i maintain them ... and if you look at the date on the d ebuild you'll find
> it was in portage a few hours after d was released ;)

d's an experimental patch.  Why is it the only version in portage?

> as for adding back in older versions, ill look into it ...

Seems a shame to have an ebuild only for a version that is well-known as 
broken ...

Especially as your ebuild for NS-2 installs the 3.1.1.0c version of NS, and 
(unless I've missed it in the ebuild) doesn't include the patch to make NS-2 
run on 3.1.1.1d.

> i'm still trying to make hlds work properly on 1.0/1.2/1.4 boxes ... glibc
> seems to cause issues of course :/

libs-compat fixes that for me just fine, at least with 3.1.1.0c + boffix.

I also noticed that Metamod is built from source.  HLDS (which is a C++ 
program) is very sensitive to which version of GCC is used to build Metamod 
(and Metamods), and most people find it seg faults most of the time when 
compiled from source.  It might be worth adding an ebuild for the binary 
release of Metamod - or talk to Will Day (metamod's author) to discuss which 
GCC & CXXFLAGS are likely to bring the most success.

I'd also be very interested in seeing HLDS support the +vhosts scheme we've 
been discussing about webapps.

Best regards,
Stu
-- 
Stuart Herbert                                              stuart@gentoo.org
Gentoo Developer                                       http://www.gentoo.org/
Beta packages for download            http://dev.gentoo.org/~stuart/packages/

GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319  C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C
--

[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2003-08-06  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-05 23:45 [gentoo-dev] Beta ebuild for game called 'Nevermind' Stuart Herbert
2003-08-05 23:51 ` [gentoo-dev] " Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
2003-08-06  1:04 ` [gentoo-dev] " Chris Gianelloni
2003-08-06  2:00   ` Stuart Herbert
2003-08-06  2:24     ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-08-06  2:48       ` Stuart Herbert
2003-08-06  2:33     ` [gentoo-dev] " Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
2003-08-06  3:38     ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Frysinger
2003-08-06  9:50       ` Stuart Herbert [this message]
2003-08-06 23:09         ` [gentoo-dev] Re: HLDS discussion Mike Frysinger
2003-08-06  1:10 ` [gentoo-dev] Beta ebuild for game called 'Nevermind' Chris Gianelloni
2003-08-06  2:08   ` Stuart Herbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200308061050.07606.stuart@gentoo.org \
    --to=stuart@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    --cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox