From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8697 invoked by uid 1002); 5 Aug 2003 16:05:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 19284 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2003 16:05:45 -0000 Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 12:05:43 -0400 From: Aron Griffis To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030805160543.GA24577@time> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <20030804160301.713ebda7.jani@iv.ro> <20030804153228.7f0ca3d5.genone@genone.homeip.net> <20030804093401.A20555@sigint.cs.purdue.edu> <20030805042817.369e210b.genone@genone.homeip.net> <20030805124356.45f1423a.spider@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030805124356.45f1423a.spider@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge harmless buglet? X-Archives-Salt: 85f76557-4161-4b0c-8a3d-e4a1adb3bfc5 X-Archives-Hash: ac055c496f525429160f2a3996f1a011 Spider wrote: [Tue Aug 05 2003, 06:43:56AM EDT] > Does this mean we can start implementing "ln -s star tar" in our > systems? (star is another tar implementation thats more posix > compliant than GNU tar is. ) This already seems to be the case on my system. $ epm -qf /usr/bin/tar star-1.5_alpha14 Aron -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list