From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30188 invoked by uid 1002); 5 Aug 2003 20:28:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 28340 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2003 20:28:15 -0000 From: George Shapovalov Organization: Gentoo Linux To: Chris Gianelloni , lafou@wanadoo.fr Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 13:27:47 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 Cc: Gentoo-dev References: <1060092496.3072.13.camel@biproc> <1060110663.3069.32.camel@biproc> <1060112631.18982.238.camel@vertigo> In-Reply-To: <1060112631.18982.238.camel@vertigo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200308051327.49397.george@gentoo.org> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 tagged_above=-100000.0 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION, IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, USER_AGENT_KMAIL X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Kernel 2.4.20 X-Archives-Salt: 0cd344fb-7dcf-4ab2-b329-818d2891f53e X-Archives-Hash: f72cd80c8b01bf26fdcef8452e72ec6f I am sure Chris did not mean to turn your offer down. Any help is certainly= =20 welcome! However you might want to try more "official" channels. Pop in onto irc.freenode.net, #gentoo, ask seemant or avenj for whom you=20 should contact in this regard, or if you know any kernel devs (check=20 corresponding ChangeLogs for example), try to reach those people directly.. Searching bugzilla for the relevant stuff migt help as well.. (The main point is, you need to contact the right people, and there are=20 certainly ways to find who they are :). Oh, btw, I am not on kernel team=20 either). George On Tuesday 05 August 2003 12:43, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 15:11, Philippe Lafoucri=E8re wrote: > > Chris, > > > > I have some free time in the next weeks, maybe I can help you with the > > kernel ebuilds if you need. > > Thank you for the offer, but I am not on the x86-kernel team and have no > desire to work on the Gentoo kernels. There are already plenty of > "fixed" kernels in the portage tree which require no work. I would > suggest anyone concerned about this denial of service exploit to use one > of those kernels. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list