From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 536 invoked by uid 1002); 4 Aug 2003 22:20:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 15701 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2003 22:20:38 -0000 Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 18:20:36 -0400 From: Aron Griffis To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030804222036.GC18109@time> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <20030804160301.713ebda7.jani@iv.ro> <200308041552.59383.vapier@gentoo.org> <20030804152856.B20555@sigint.cs.purdue.edu> <200308041816.00784.vapier@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200308041816.00784.vapier@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge harmless buglet? X-Archives-Salt: 3db06684-b149-4781-a327-01fd5d9b4805 X-Archives-Hash: b1976e71dd08158ac8bfb8c8206a982d Vapier wrote: [Mon Aug 04 2003, 06:15:50PM EDT] > anyone have thoughts on how to handle this as intended ? Use PIPE_STATUS. I've thought about writing another one like die/assert. It would be assert_pipe, which would require that each element in the pipe returns zero exit status. What do you think? (History: I wrote "die" in the first place.) Aron -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list