From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-5261-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 11285 invoked by uid 1002); 4 Aug 2003 19:53:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 24505 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2003 19:53:01 -0000
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Reply-To: vapier@gentoo.org
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:52:58 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2
References: <20030804160301.713ebda7.jani@iv.ro> <20030804153228.7f0ca3d5.genone@genone.homeip.net> <20030804093401.A20555@sigint.cs.purdue.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20030804093401.A20555@sigint.cs.purdue.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1;
  boundary="Boundary-02=_bmrL/B4o/YrHcq0";
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200308041552.59383.vapier@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge harmless buglet?
X-Archives-Salt: 62d94e34-6c19-41e3-a6e5-a6463d02d068
X-Archives-Hash: aa78b2a8f785760d7d158e893b71fcf1

--Boundary-02=_bmrL/B4o/YrHcq0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline

On Monday 04 August 2003 10:34, splite-gentoo@sigint.cs.purdue.edu wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 03:32:28PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > The fixed line is
> > 	notok=3Dspawn("bzip2 -dc "+mytbz2+" | tar xpf -",free=3D1)

actually thats wrong, you'll still get a warning msg ;)
if you look at the bug i filed sometime ago (#25293) the better line is:
notok=3Dspawn("bzcat -q "+mytbz2+" | tar xpf -",free=3D1)

> Why not:
>
>  	notok=3Dspawn("tar xpjf "+mytbz2,free=3D1)

that assumes that tar supports bzip2 ... anyone who has used bsd/older *nix=
s=20
will tell you, dont plan on it :)

=2Dmike

--Boundary-02=_bmrL/B4o/YrHcq0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
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=8z9D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_bmrL/B4o/YrHcq0--