From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19301 invoked by uid 1002); 3 Aug 2003 22:19:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 9405 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2003 22:19:34 -0000 Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 18:19:33 -0400 From: Aron Griffis To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030803221933.GB31440@time> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <200308022229.12533.vapier@gentoo.org> <200308031953.03414.stuart@gentoo.org> <200308031327.26379.george@gentoo.org> <200308032135.01978.stuart@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200308032135.01978.stuart@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Some 'proper coding' notes for ebuilds X-Archives-Salt: ca665e20-bd31-4ce1-9116-8e12fadc0d8b X-Archives-Hash: c1c75a8244c21191e2b8d60acf71cb26 Stu, Stuart Herbert wrote: [Sun Aug 03 2003, 04:34:58PM EDT] > What's next - forcing people to use emacs over vi, or vice versa? ;-) > Seriously, I refer you back to my previous post about why engineers > use coding standards. While I agree with you (and jwz) regarding coding standards, and tabs-vs-spaces, I clearly remember the discussion from a year ago. Tabs are the rule for indenting ebuilds. (I don't mind the thought of the rule changing eventually, but at the moment the rule stands.) Aron -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list