From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31496 invoked by uid 1002); 3 Aug 2003 03:04:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 21622 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2003 03:04:54 -0000 From: Mike Frysinger Reply-To: vapier@gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 23:04:51 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <200308022229.12533.vapier@gentoo.org> <200308022238.57835.vapier@gentoo.org> <3F2C7887.50103@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <3F2C7887.50103@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_TvHL/KiISP/MCio"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200308022304.51692.vapier@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Some 'proper coding' notes for ebuilds X-Archives-Salt: 4bdf0697-68e6-4e95-bfe4-c09c1eb05ffc X-Archives-Hash: 3b7594dc557793b444d5f25b3cff4a0f --Boundary-02=_TvHL/KiISP/MCio Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 02 August 2003 22:50, Kumba wrote: > Isn't the only time we want to avoid this on a kernel ebuild? There was > an email many weeks ago on -dev I think (mighta been -core) which said > to avoid using epatch on kernel sources, due to it's brute-force method. > Also, what about "xpatch"? I had heard of this mechanism used awhile > ago, but not recently. this was meant as a general heads up ... i'm sure the kernel team can handl= e=20 the kernel ebuilds just fine themselves ;) as for xpatch, i havent utilized it myself and havent looked into it ... ri= ght=20 now 'epatch' is in portage, 'xpatch' is not ... it doesnt really matter too= =20 much since if we upgrade all packages to use epatch, we can easily switch=20 over to 'xpatch' pkgs that currently use xpatch: app-text/a2ps =2Dmike --Boundary-02=_TvHL/KiISP/MCio Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAPyx700FjO5/oN/WBAQIQ5g//X18Wbh8rcCWRuR3eKaH9P8CUIrVlNr6h uCElClAi3v22fKhPWzB3g96DCCCBSssFwg6450fN0Wyfo0EY1L0ew26uHXEVEby4 MwQBBjVmX8sASWhJrI5on2WncA/leDIYGyjjM3iMOy3b+Bl5+fYTlJ+OL2DWAHbE lIOBCOZ5HkZdhdqPGOkbl9CHBzHFZYg7/N1EWWMe8G+JpGwY+9jEAO6M5bOIHspN eljvQQIgN9F3+9x321tCI1GUb0AD1yb4AcP4spc99L8+z3vunD1w5xN6OVHpMjJd ff7iKybVbEUrvTYEu12cjYDVL8glpqk76GPQY9SQLIVhxc1K0xx5C3Wa4vQXFmYi C8buLq5uFmH4yuQtApG27lM9I64BeksX2D1KX9C7UFpG2Ig0tFeZ8kCXscXShRt7 7zKtvUyUyG4FBOkAatLzgQwY5SFcYH/wG1PGiWdmHiJxKCYGMdd3puOn6d5NgPTC VhtQI/TWWBMDhgE/LZ5paVqkEIhxlMB2pMPohE8Vv2AqFEW9ZC/TZJWv7+n9/Pbs j0BIa1CujXE2PHpo/Qjq3HMZkF1sHid5WVbRpUrm7lnNJUomfOy7GYQ2EkaGj+qr 2/6BXs+yTSv5YRodAeyN3NqyACVLv8/18CFVYmzKkqfXK0U5OHF8QZP+hJcMxrSj InZyDAYFuew= =mwKa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_TvHL/KiISP/MCio--