From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17749 invoked by uid 1002); 1 Aug 2003 21:22:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 25552 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2003 21:22:01 -0000 From: George Shapovalov Organization: Gentoo Linux To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 14:22:01 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <20030801175719.GA19260@kc5eiv.homeip.net> <3F2AB1EF.9000002@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <3F2AB1EF.9000002@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200308011422.02526.george@gentoo.org> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 tagged_above=-100000.0 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION, IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, USER_AGENT_KMAIL X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] getting sus-2.0.1 marked stable X-Archives-Salt: 8fc1279a-cca3-4107-909d-0fea94ed56f0 X-Archives-Hash: e8be0906ca4d0643ee56ac8c543de1a6 I prefer getting test reports added to the same bug, - this is why we got RESOLVED/TEST_REQUEST after all! (the bug is already "invisible" in normal mode, but easily searchable - by "Assigned To" and its status, quite handy for sweeping updates). After I collect sufficient amount of reports (depending on whether it is a fix, update, are there any otyher problems reported and other stuff..) I mark the package stable and *close* the bug (its becoming now CLOSED, still keeping "minor status" of TEST-REQUEST although). Just my 2 cents on how one can keep track of things without expanding number of bugs :). George On Friday 01 August 2003 11:31, Kumba wrote: > Usually you file another bug in that case. While not technically a > "bug" bug, it still lets us keep track of those kind of needed updates. > > --Kumba -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list