[gentoo-dev] Gentoo cvs changelog emails

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo cvs changelog emails

[Dhruba Bandopadhyay]

Hello

On 27 July 2003 I received a cvs changelog email and thought that the 
list may have been resurrected from the dungeons but once again it has 
stopped.  Any further news?

With regards


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo cvs changelog emails

[Mike Frysinger]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 30 July 2003 11:19, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote:
> On 27 July 2003 I received a cvs changelog email and thought that the
> list may have been resurrected from the dungeons but once again it has
> stopped.  Any further news?

it's being worked on, it should start working properly soon
- -mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
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=iH85
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo cvs changelog emails

[Dhruba Bandopadhyay]

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Wednesday 30 July 2003 11:19, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote:
> 
>>On 27 July 2003 I received a cvs changelog email and thought that the
>>list may have been resurrected from the dungeons but once again it has
>>stopped.  Any further news?
> 
> 
> it's being worked on, it should start working properly soon

Thanks.  It seems to be working now.

Would it be possible to omit entries that mention only a manifest 
fixing?  It's just that there's so many of them everytime (done by 
scripts I presume) the email becomes really long.

With regards.


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo cvs changelog emails

[Michael Cummings]

As the one that got it working, I'm biased...

I'd say no to that (unless outvoted of course) on the grounds that a
manifest change *is* worthy of note. It means that the checksum has
changed on one of the files listed. 


On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 09:00:14AM +0100, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> 
> Thanks.  It seems to be working now.
> 
> Would it be possible to omit entries that mention only a manifest 
> fixing?  It's just that there's so many of them everytime (done by 
> scripts I presume) the email becomes really long.
> 
> With regards.
> 
> 
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> 

-- 


-----o()o---------------------------------------------
              |  http://www.gentoo.org/
              |  #gentoo-dev  on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo Dev    |  #gentoo-perl on irc.freenode.net
Perl Guy      |
              |  GnuPG Key ID:       AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E
-----o()o---------------------------------------------


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo cvs changelog emails

[Paul de Vrieze]

[-- Attachment #1: signed data --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 568 bytes --]

On Friday 01 August 2003 12:52, Michael Cummings wrote:
> As the one that got it working, I'm biased...
>
> I'd say no to that (unless outvoted of course) on the grounds that a
> manifest change *is* worthy of note. It means that the checksum has
> changed on one of the files listed.
>

I would say that a change of manifest is caused by a change in the files that 
are "manifested", as such I believe there is not much added value to manifest 
changes.

Paul

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Researcher
Mail: pauldv@cs.kun.nl
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net

[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo cvs changelog emails

[robh]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 358 bytes --]

Oh please,

All of you get a grip. The cvs change emails should list whats changed
in CVS. If a manifest has changed, it should be listed.

Filtering out things some deem un-importanet it stupid.

Get over it.

-- 
rob holland - [ tigger@gentoo.org ]
irc://irc.freenode.net/#gentoo as tigger^
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tigger/tigger@gentoo.org.asc

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo cvs changelog emails

[Aron Griffis]

Paul de Vrieze wrote:	[Fri Aug 01 2003, 08:11:11AM EDT]
> I would say that a change of manifest is caused by a change in the
> files that are "manifested", as such I believe there is not much added
> value to manifest changes.

I'd prefer if the cvs changelog emails are left as-is.  They can be
filtered client-side if that's preferred.  Here's a working .procmailrc
recipe:

:0 fw
* ^From: cvs@gentoo.org
* ^Subject: gentoo-x86 CVS ChangeLog
|perl -0777 -pe 's/^2\d{3}-[^\n]*\n\n[^:]+:\s*(Manifest(,\s*)?)+:.*?(?=^2)//gms'

Aron

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo cvs changelog emails

[Michael Cummings]

On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 06:52:33AM -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
> As the one that got it working, I'm biased...

Egads, someone install an email nanny. "the one that got it working"
totally voids all of the work that kurt and rob did on getting this
going, and I more than humbly withdraw that statement - Kurt, Rob,
please accept my apologies, I wrote that in haste and should not have
taken any kind of singular credit - this was a group effort through and
through, and my part was only in the last stages. Someone please shoot
me.


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list