From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31718 invoked by uid 1002); 1 Aug 2003 12:15:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 27933 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2003 12:15:51 -0000 Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 08:20:52 -0400 From: Michael Cummings To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030801122052.GH1256@enki.datanode.net> Reply-To: mcummings@gentoo.org Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <3F27E21D.5010000@codewordt.co.uk> <200307301839.24988.vapier@gentoo.org> <3F2A1E0E.4050303@codewordt.co.uk> <20030801105233.GF1256@enki.datanode.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030801105233.GF1256@enki.datanode.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo cvs changelog emails X-Archives-Salt: 8f836d45-daa6-448d-9d45-b70306941e9e X-Archives-Hash: c688b4e90589d99fc06247283eb24716 On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 06:52:33AM -0400, Michael Cummings wrote: > As the one that got it working, I'm biased... Egads, someone install an email nanny. "the one that got it working" totally voids all of the work that kurt and rob did on getting this going, and I more than humbly withdraw that statement - Kurt, Rob, please accept my apologies, I wrote that in haste and should not have taken any kind of singular credit - this was a group effort through and through, and my part was only in the last stages. Someone please shoot me. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list